The current Industrial and commercial climate
has catalyzed a shift in the managerial environment. This shift is
mapped below :
MANAGEMENT SHIFT MAP
From
To
Management by control
Management by commitment
Competitive Edge :
Finance & manufacturing
(I) All competencies and competencies
capabilities
(ii) Knowledge base of the
organization
People :
(I) Safe - keeping
(I) Risk - taking
(ii) Dependence on the
( ii) Inter-dependence with the
Organization
organization
(iii) Toe - the - line attitude
(iii) Independent thinkers
Focus :
(I) Technology
(I) Technology
(ii) Finance
(ii) Process
(iii) Values
(iv) Skills
This shift has triggered the increasing importance of facilitating skills in the skill inventory of leaders.
CASE IN POINT :
A DIVERSIFIED INDIAN COMPANY
A facilitative
leader of a Regional sales office left the organization. He was replaced
by a leader with a predominantly instructional style of functioning .
Impact on the team :
(1)
With in two months of the new leader joining , all the team members
had availed of the leaves accrued to them over the past 1 ½
years , which had not been taken earlier.
(2)
More than 50% of the Team members were actively searching for a job - change.
FACILITATION SKILLS :
Facilitation skills may be interpreted as skills that enable and trigger
high performance in work groups . The facilitation skills experiential
cases are given below :
Since the
team members have different backgrounds and motivations , it is quite natural
for them to be focussing on differing priorities.
The leader
has to consciously trigger a shared perception of the goal , working
process , resources & norms. This creates team synergy.
Experiential
case : In one of my outbound training programmes
with a diversified Indian Company , a team was asked to achieve a specific
objective in competition with other teams.
The team leader failed to align the team to the team's strategy with respect
to the goal , process , resources & norms in the strategizing session.
Observed impact :
a. The leader was not aware of the functioning and
whereabouts of some team members.
b. Two team members , basing their actions on differing
priorities , placed themselves in positions detrimental to the team's effectiveness.
c. The energy levels in the team were low to start
with and subsequently kept on declining in the face of no visible results.
2. TRIGGERING SKILLS : Over a period of time , a team develops a dominant way of perceiving and reacting to problems. Though this helps in case of repetitive problems , however in situations which demand new thinking , dominant mental patterns can become major blocks to team's creative problem solving.
Experiential
case : In the regional sales office of
Bush Boake Allen ( BBA) in the evening at 6 'o'clock it was found
that material ( flavor) which was to be supplied to one of their major
customers had not reached . This was resulting in the client's shutting
down of operations.
Reactions :
a. Where is the product : it was
found that the truck carrying the order was stuck somewhere in the south.
b. The concerned area sales manager
called up their warehouse but found that the required flavor was out -
of - stock.
When appraised of the situation , the regional sales manager enabled solution
finding through the following triggers :
Trigger 1 : Where
would this flavor be available ?
Answer :
Dealer
Trigger 2 : 'Ring
up' the nearest dealer and find out if the flavor is available ?
On finding the product available at one of the dealers , the dealer was
asked to deliver it to the relevant customer.
3. VALUE EXTRACTION
: Value extraction refers to the skill of extracting the value
from differing perspectives , prevalent in a team. Most of the time
, these differing perspectives are shot down by team members because of
the prevalence of dominant perspectives. If the leader consciously visibilizes
the value in a differing perspective and integrates it with the final adopted
solution , the impact is as follows :
a. The solution improves.
b. The person , who gives
the differing perspective becomes aligned with the team and is motivated
to contribute further.
On the other hand, if the idea had been summarily rejected , the contributing team member may have become a detractor.
Experiential case :
In the packing sector of a manufacturing unit, the productivity was low
because the packers used to start reading the paper packing of the
product.
In a problem solving
sessions , one team participant said "If you want them to stop reading
the paper , why don't you poke their eyes out".
The leader could have
responded in different ways :
a. He can say , "Please be
serious"
or
b. On extracting the value
from this outrageous perspective and using it as a stepping stone the leader
triggered "How do we ensure that the packers don't read the paper"
The following solutions were propounded :
a. Hire blind
b. Hire illiterates
c. Use other language newspapers
On analysis these solutions were found to be viable.
4. INVOLVING SKILLS : The leader's skills of involving the team members during meetings and problem solving sessions , has a clear impact on the alignment and initiative levels within the team.
One process of involving is given below :
Think -----------------> Share --------------> Present
Think : Individual thinking time
Share : Sharing with sub
- team members
Present : Presentation to the entire problem
solving group
The involving process is backed up by triggers for shifting perception.
Experiential case
: A multinational FMCG company's (name withheld) "Annual
sales and marketing conference"
Focus : Two sessions
Session 1
Session 2
1. Dominant style :
facilitative
Instructive
2. Skills used :
a. Involving
skills
Questioning
b. Triggering skills
Presentation
c. Aligning
skills
3. Observable impact :
a. Total participation
Information appreciation
b. High initiative levels
Involvement of 20 - 25 % of the
participants
c. Valuable output
50 % of the participants were
slouching in their seats
d. High problem comprehension and
Low comprehension levels
solution thinking
In
the first session , , Participation , Comprehension and Solution Thinking
was very high , whereas in the second session only 20 - 25 % of the group
showed signs of involvement and 50 % were slouching in their seats. The
Leader in the first session had a facilitative style , while one in the
second session had an instructive style. Facilitation Skills may prove
to be an invaluable asset.